Here you can find more details about my research

Journal articles:

Ying, Heng. 2025. “Explaining Moral View Change: Second-Order Moral Reasoning.” Journal of Value Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-025-10069-2

Ying, Heng. 2025. “Beyond ‘Moral Progress’: A Dual-Character Conception of Moral Change.” Metaphilosophy 56(2): 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12723

Articles in submission:

Moral conflict—I challenge group accounts of moral conflict in moral psychology. They often assume a reactive conception of moral agency, highlighting how individuals are influenced by the moral education received from communities and disagree with those from different communities. By introducing a responsive conception to distinguish individuals, especially members of the same groups, I show how the agential processes underlying opinion formation offer a new ground for grouping individuals and examining the nature of moral disagreement.

Moral progress–Reframing history-based accounts of moral progress in psychological terms, I highlight moral progress–as historical processes–should be understood as a battle between different thinking styles. I argue that transformative actions are driven by a self-limiting moral thinking, instead of a thinking style associated with a liberating effect. This new perspective reorients individuals within society, prompting a reflection on the true goal of moral change.

Research in preparation:

Moral psychology & social philosophy–I propose a framework called “Asymmetrical Moral Thinking” to capture individuals’ asymmetrical moral judgments and responses to situations with similar moral properties, natures and consequences. I propose failures in extending attention as the core underlying mechanism. I apply this framework to explain the phenomena of the persistence of injustices.



Moral Psychology–I challenged the interpretive paradigm psychologists and neuroscientists adopt to explain some key studies that uphold the Humean model of moral psychology. Since the paradigm is flawed, the studies are open to a new interpretation, which offers new insight into the structure of individual moral psychology.